"It's never too late to unkink your karma"
"Don't ever think you shouldn't feel something."
"Judging others is where I draw the line (in context of what they didn't abide with in others)."
There are a lot of poor philosophies floating around amongst fairly intelligent people these days. I wonder if a poor philosopher does a poor philosophy make. Analyzing this question, I know a hypocritical philosopher can come up with a good maxim and a good philosophy can be fallen upon by a bad philosopher. However, there are individuals who are quite happy to march through life to the beat of an arrhythmic routine; to recite words from an unplanned play.
I would say everyone I have encountered has sinned against pure logic. Has bowed before the idol of confirmation bias. Has given way to an emotional appeal. How are we to safeguard against the corruption of cognitive dissonance? What must we enact to have a stolid react? We must have a rich philosophy of life. We require a consistent worldview.
Our worldview should make sense of reality. It should explain possibilities and impossibilities. It is fundamental in our thinking. From it, we draw our variables of life to formulate algorithms for decision making. We interpret morality, epistemology, and reality through our worldview. Our worldview is revealed in our actions and our inactions.
This worldview should have at least thought about cosmology, ontology, and eschatology. Where did we come from? Why are we here? Where will it end? These are the questions that have the most value in life, because from these answers, like a good story, we understand everything between and among.
